Named Relay - 2025-10-23 08:47:20
First!
Marcus Gerdon - 2025-10-23 08:51:45
:)
Petra Zeidler - 2025-10-23 08:55:06
good yawning
Alvaro Vives Martinez - 2025-10-23 09:01:41
Hi everyone, I'm Alvaro Vives from the RIPE NCC. This chat panel is meant for discussion ONLY. If you have questions for the speaker and you want the session chair to read them out, please write them in the Q&A window, also stating your affiliation. Otherwise, you can ask questions using the microphone icon.
Alvaro Vives Martinez - 2025-10-23 09:01:51
Please note that all chat transcripts will be archived and made available to the public at https://ripe91.ripe.net/.
Alvaro Vives Martinez - 2025-10-23 09:02:00
The RIPE Code of Conduct applies to all sessions. The RIPE Code of Conduct: https://www.ripe.net/publications/docs/ripe-766/.
Named Relay - 2025-10-23 09:12:27
Google is seeing between 44% and 49% IPv6 traffic on work days and weekends respectively. (More IPv6 availability at home causes weekly swings.)
Marcus Gerdon - 2025-10-23 09:26:50
I wonder if regulation would allow for "discriminating" ipv4... separate on-top pricing, bandwidth limitations, different sla or alike.
Alvaro Vives Martinez - 2025-10-23 09:28:05
Hi Marcus Gerdon, please write your question in the Q&A panel, or please wait until the end of the talk and ask your question using audio. Thank you!
Named Relay - 2025-10-23 09:29:29
Marcus, there already kind of IS a legal requirement to implement IPv6, depending on interpretation...
Petra Zeidler - 2025-10-23 09:30:14
for my employer: we're not an operator. we are a part of the precipitate because all available network operators are bound up in hardware and software updates, mostly, lightly sprinkled with outages and connecting new sites. Better software quality and less planned obsolescence of our hardware vendor would go a long way towards getting this unstuck.
Marcus Gerdon - 2025-10-23 09:31:06
Named, I'm thinking of the next step after enabling dual-stack: actively discourage people from using v4.
Marcus Gerdon - 2025-10-23 09:31:33
-talking from access-provider perspective
Marcus Gerdon - 2025-10-23 09:32:22
As, well, money is the primary thing that makes enterprises move their as$$.
Saiidnajib Saidislomzoda - 2025-10-23 09:33:34
Not "Saiidnaib", Saiidnajib)
Wolfgang Tremmel - 2025-10-23 09:33:57
Sorry for this
Saiidnajib Saidislomzoda - 2025-10-23 09:34:12
Ok, no problem)
Christian Seitz - 2025-10-23 09:34:54
It was not my intention to pronounce your name wrong, but it's not an easy name ;-)
Mick O'Donovan - 2025-10-23 09:35:09
In some enterprises, where they may have a medium to large size of IPv4 allocation, their IT Directors have been encouraged (sometimes by their cyber security insurance companies) to simply do a NAT overload to a single IPv4 address and not use any of their /21 of ipv4 or whatever
Named Relay - 2025-10-23 09:35:21
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2015/2120/oj/eng#:~:text=irrespective%20of%20the%20network%20technology
Saiidnajib Saidislomzoda - 2025-10-23 09:35:47
I khow, everybody who hear my name in first time, difficaul for them to proniunce it)
Saiidnajib Saidislomzoda - 2025-10-23 09:36:54
*difficult, *pronounce
Named Relay - 2025-10-23 09:39:38
From the link i provided, do a Control-F on "irrespective", it shows up in the places with interesting parts of the law that seem to imply that IPv6 is a legal requirement.
Petra Zeidler - 2025-10-23 09:40:48
"Developers need to understand networking" - ha, I have trouble getting them to not go "the network has to be 100% perfect, if it isn't and that causes issues, that's not a bug in my software" with IPv4 either
Marcus Gerdon - 2025-10-23 09:45:08
Sounds like recommending a future security nightmare. 🤔
Petra Zeidler - 2025-10-23 09:50:33
start with a) get address space b) WAN router + firewall c) homeoffice VPN
Victoria Risk - 2025-10-23 10:14:17
Apnic offers a lot of ipv6 trainings
Dave Phelan - 2025-10-23 10:14:39
Yes we do..but more focused towards operators
Dave Phelan - 2025-10-23 10:15:07
There is some enterprise things there, focused on address planning
Ondřej Caletka - 2025-10-23 10:16:20
So speaking of greedy people wanting more addresses for themselves, I think the following presentation is a great seguay
Ondřej Caletka - 2025-10-23 10:26:19
No scalability concerns for the network is quite a stretch. Like if every network gateway was capable to hold as many routes in the forwarding table as there are devices connected.
Ondřej Caletka - 2025-10-23 10:26:27
Too bad there would be no time for questions.
Alvaro Vives Martinez - 2025-10-23 10:29:48
This session has now ended. Remember to vote for your favourite presentations by Monday, 27 October! Log in to your RIPE NCC Access account on the RIPE 91 website and visit the session pages. If you are logged in, you will see an icon next to a presentation to rate it. The next session in the Main Room is Address Policy, and in the Side Room is DNS, and they will start at 11:00. More info on the RIPE 91 meeting plan: https://ripe91.ripe.net/programme/meeting-plan/